EntertainmentNews

Court Drama as Davido Walks Out During Custody Hearing

Proceedings in the ongoing custody dispute between Nigerian music star David Adeleke, popularly known as Davido, and entrepreneur Sophia Momodu were marked by heightened tension during the latest sitting of the court, as a series of incidents briefly disrupted proceedings.

The case, which centres on custodial arrangements for the parties’ daughter, has continued to draw public interest due to the high-profile nature of those involved. At the most recent hearing, courtroom observers reported a charged atmosphere during cross-examination, when counsel to Ms. Momodu raised questions relating to parental supervision and past household circumstances. References were reportedly made to the late Ifeanyi Adeleke in the course of questioning.

According to multiple sources present in court, Mr. Adeleke reacted emotionally during the exchange and exited the courtroom while proceedings were ongoing. The development temporarily interrupted the session before proceedings continued.

Sources further stated that upon his return, the presiding judge directed Mr. Adeleke to apologise to the court and to counsel representing Ms. Momodu over his conduct. However, witnesses indicated that no apology was issued during that sitting. Raised voices were reportedly heard during an exchange between Mr. Adeleke and the bench before the matter was eventually adjourned.

In a related development, businessman Adedeji Adeleke, father of the singer and a witness in the matter, was observed standing and approaching the bench during proceedings. It remains unclear whether any formal communication took place at that moment or whether the court made any pronouncement regarding the action.

Court sources also suggested that this was not the first instance in which Mr. Adeleke had withdrawn from proceedings, noting that a similar occurrence was reported during earlier mediation discussions connected to the custody dispute.

Legal analysts note that custody matters under Nigerian law are determined primarily on the basis of the best interest of the child, with courts typically considering factors such as emotional stability, parental cooperation, and the overall welfare and development of the child.

As of the time of filing this report, neither Mr. Adeleke nor Ms. Momodu has issued an official public statement addressing the reported courtroom developments. The case has been adjourned to a later date.

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button